carl
British banking giant Barclays found itself in court again today as it attempted to strike out a portion of the lawsuit brought against it by a group of investors over alleged fraudulent activities in the United States. The case is attracting significant attention due to the serious nature of the claims and the high-profile parties involved.
Allegations by Allianz Global Investors and Others
The claimants, a collective of investors including Allianz Global Investors, have invested in, continued to hold, or disposed of ordinary shares in Barclays Bank, which is publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange. Their legal action is rooted in allegations that the bank engaged in deceptive practices related to its alternative trading system, “LX Liquidity Cross.”
The controversy began on 26 June 2014, when Barclays issued a Regulatory News Service (RNS) article announcing that the Attorney General of the State of New York had filed a complaint in the New York State Courts. The complaint was part of an investigation into the bank’s operations involving “LX Liquidity Cross.”
Settlement with New York Attorney General and the SEC
The case took a significant turn two years later, on 31 January 2016, when Barclays and its subsidiary, Barclays Capital Inc., entered into a settlement agreement with the New York Attorney General. The agreement also involved compliance with an order issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The SEC charged Barclays, along with Credit Suisse, with violations related to “dark pool” trading activities, which are private exchanges for trading securities not accessible by the general public. These dark pools are often criticized for their lack of transparency. As a result, Barclays faced a hefty fine of $70 million, with $35 million paid to the SEC and another $35 million to the New York Attorney General.
Legal Action by Institutional Investors
In response to the allegations and subsequent settlement, a group of institutional investors engaged the law firm Signature to file a claim against Barclays in 2020. This lawsuit was lodged with the Financial List of the High Court as a group action, representing a concerted effort by the investors to seek justice.
The claimants are seeking damages related to the decline in Barclays’ share price, alleging that the bank’s misconduct in its “dark pool” trading activities led to financial losses. The lawsuit aims to hold Barclays accountable for the impact of its actions on shareholders.
Barclays’ Response
As the legal proceedings continue, Barclays is vigorously defending itself against the allegations. The bank is seeking to have parts of the lawsuit dismissed, arguing that the claims lack sufficient merit to proceed. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for Barclays and its investors, highlighting the complex nature of financial litigation involving major institutions.
Broader Implications
This case underscores the ongoing challenges faced by financial institutions in navigating regulatory compliance and maintaining investor trust. The scrutiny on Barclays’ trading practices and the subsequent legal battle reflect broader concerns about transparency and accountability in the banking sector.
As the court proceedings unfold, industry observers will be closely watching for any developments that could influence the outcome and potentially set a precedent for similar cases in the future. The resolution of this lawsuit will be pivotal in determining the course of action for both Barclays and the group of investors seeking damages for alleged misconduct.
4o
